Once, when I was working on an article about UFOs, I sent a letter to Jacques Vallee regarding any comments he wished to make concerning his current thoughts on the subject. A few weeks later, I received a photocopy of a newspaper article entitled "Kooks, Nuts and Weirdos" with a handwritten note that this is what he thought.
Maybe I was missing something, but I kind of got the impression that he didn't feel like talking about it. I have long admired much of his writing (and still highly recommend most of his books as essential reading), but there was definitely an attitude. At the time, I figured he was looking to drop the whole subject.
Then again, maybe not. Over at the BoingBoing.net web site, Vallee has posted several interesting pieces on the subject of crop circles. They are both a quick read but very concise and sort of thought provoking. Kind of. Actually, the theory that crop circles might be the result of some super secret microwave weapon has been kicked around over the years. Not a bad theory. So far, impossible to prove in any way. Doesn't help that the only obvious use (thus far) of such a mysterious weapon is to spend every summer zapping the English countryside just to jack up the locals. By the way, the complex and extremely well developed artistic quality of many of these circles seem beyond the skills of the U.S. Army. So it must be a Navy project.
But what is most interesting about Vallee's work is the reactions he is getting in the comments posted at BoingBoing. Basically, many of the comments seem confused by most of the statements Vallee makes concerning the known qualities of non-man made crop circles. A lot of people have very strong opinions about the subject backed up by no information what so ever. So it would seem that many of the known facts listed in the piece by Vallee is a major surprise to a lot of readers.
So maybe Vallee has actually done a public service. He quickly lays out the main proven facts before moving into his theory. It has been known for quite a few years that at least some amount of crop circles are produced by some type of high energy process and, most likely, does not have a human origin. Sure, there are also a lot of them that are produced by people who have embraced the concept as an art form. Some of them even do some mighty pretty work. But some are simply not handmade, if you know what I mean.
Where I do split from Vallee is with the secret microwave weapon theory. OK, granted that the U.S. military has some really weird project going on and, most likely, got some weapons stashed away that are pretty far out (e.g. the laser cannon). But blasting at farm fields for no rational reason just doesn't seem to make any sense. Besides, we have lots of secret bases and test zones all over the globe just for that purpose.
I am also curious as to why Vallee seems to ignore the research that has been done in attempting to decode crop circles. No, I don't mean the New Age trace induced stuff. I'm talking about the work that was being pursued by Gerald Hawkins before his death a few years ago. Best known for his decoding of Stonehenge back in 1963, Hawkins became increasingly convinced that some of the crop circles were a form of code closely related to both math and music.
Maybe he was on to something, or maybe not. He died before he completed the work. But his theories were extremely interesting and his approach would seemingly be of interest to someone like Vallee. Then again, maybe not.
Seems that Vallee is more focused on a bunch of G.I. Joes whizzing around in their saucer-shaped jets blasting microwaves at the cows.
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Strange days indeed. I have gone to England the past nine summers to check out the crop circles first hand. From the air, ground, and "tuning in" to see what shows up during quiet time in and around the formations. After many months and years in the fields a few things have become quite clear:
While some number are man-made, many are not.
They are certainly products of some form of energy which remains present even after the formation is harvested.
The idea of the US or UK testing secret technology in the public farms of Wiltshire to make geometric designs each summer is absurd.
Those people who "imitate" the phenomenon by creating their own crop circles are nearly as mysterious as the genuine phenomenon. A very odd lot.
Form, proportion, math, vibration, and energy are at the heart of the phenomenon.
Every year I learn and observe something new. Most years someone new shows up professing to have discovered what the phenomenon is all about. Once their theory no longer holds water, they disappear.
Most people that think the formations are all man-made have not spent much time researching the phenomenon.
Once we figure out what this is all about, we will wish we had been paying attention for the past 20 years.
It's an amazing and intriguing mystery that deserves out attention. No one has it figured out just yet.
Thanks for your perspective
"He quickly lays out the main proven facts before moving into his theory. It has been known for quite a few years that at least some amount of crop circles are produced by some type of high energy process and, most likely, does not have a human origin. Sure, there are also a lot of them that are produced by people who have embraced the concept as an art form. Some of them even do some mighty pretty work. But some are simply not handmade, if you know what I mean."
How can you tell if a crop circle has been made by the local "beer garden artists" or interdimensional entities from the 38th interstitial plane of uberreality?
What does this "high energy process" do that differentiates its effects from some hippy with a wooden plank?
I ask these questions because I've seen people go on about crop circles being created by non human forces, when I know the all too human artists that created them.
Gyrehawk
If you follow the link to Vallee's article you get the basic data involving the studied side effects caused by some form of energy source on crop circles that were not made by people using boards etc. It is this evidence of an unusual energy source that has led Vallee to the theory that he proposes. Also you can Google Colin Andrews and look up the results of his studies, which have been pretty detailed on this issue.
Post a Comment